Grocery stores can sometimes be as good for people watching as bus stations.  People are generally just doing their own thing and you can tell a lot about a person by what is in their basket or cart.   The way they behave is another good indication like the guy who talked to me in the checkout line yesterday at No Frills.

It wasn’t that busy but at that particular time there were a fair number of people in line and only 4 or 5 cashes open.  A few of the people ahead of me had full carts and a few people were just carrying a few items.  The express (1-8) lane was on the other side of the store.  I had about 20 items or so in a basket.  The guy behind me smelled like alcohol and had a full cart.  His cart even included a small lap dog complete with giant spiked  collar and a neckerchief  (spellcheck says that’s a word, yay.  Spellcheck  also says that spellcheck and yay are not.)  with a marijuana leaf.  You get the idea.

He starts grumbling and sighing and wondering aloud why people aren’t going to the express aisle.  At one point he directed one of his comments at me and my 20 items.  A few more comments and I’d had enough.  I turned back to him and said, “you know, if you think I have so few items that it would take me no time at all to go through the express aisle, then you shouldn’t have any problem waiting behind me in this aisle.”  He didn’t get it.

“But you’ll get out faster.”

“That’s not the point.”

“But we’ll all get out faster.”

“Not the people behind me in the express line.  That’s the point.  It’d be rude to those people.”

“I wouldn’t consider it rude.”

“Well you’re not in the express aisle.  But you’re apparently taking offense at this….”

“I’ve gone in the express aisle with more than 8 items a bunch of times, and they’ve only said anything once or twice.”

“Well thats you, and like they would actually say anything.  So why don’t you go then?”

“Well…” as he points to his cart.

“Exactly.”

I tried to end the conversation with that which worked for a while.  Then ahead of us in line there was some commotion as a rather cute young woman with an elegant outfit and pigtails (Call me!  Yes, you!  You bought a 2L carton of milk.  I believe it was 1% milk.) who was carrying her groceries in cloth shopping bags moved out of the way to let someone with a cart by so the walkway wouldn’t be clogged (or something like that.)

Somehow, this guy took offence and said, “yeah, you see what I’m talking about now?”

“Not at all.”

“You know, you got to learn things aren’t always black and white.”

I couldn’t help but chuckle at being given a lesson on moral relativism in No Frills.

He continued, “you know, when I stopped seeing things in black and white is when I started to enjoy life.”

“Well, I started enjoying my life when I stopped being selfish.”

He thought about that for a while before saying, “I’m not telling anyone to do anything, I’m just having a conversation in line.”

“Okay, that’s fine.”

“Maybe I’m just anxious because my dog is with me. ”

I’d forgotten about the dog in his cart.  Because, you know, the “No Dogs” sign is just a suggestion like the “1-8 items” sign.  It doesn’t apply to you if you don’t want it to or you feel it inconveniences you in any way.  Allergies be damned you’re entitled to bring your dog to rub up against food you haven’t paid for.

Sigh.

A couple weeks ago someone asked me how to spell “3M” …  Really?  It’s only one of the world’s biggest companies.  The fact that its only two characters long and is spelled exactly how it sounds  makes this a pretty big head scratcher.   Good thing I didn’t used to work for Eyebeeyim or Ayteeandtee.

As expected, 24 sucked.  It was a dreadful piece of American propaganda.  Wasn’t this how pretty much every season ended?  This was the series finale, wasn’t it?  Oh, of course, Jack Bauer has to make his big screen debut being chased by the Russians all over the world (in real time, of course) while being helped by reluctant yet loyal Cole and Chloe.   What will it be called, 88 Minutes 84 Minutes?  1:24?

They should have gone out with a bang.  The IRK declaring war on Russia, Russia threatening the US, the Americans retaliating, a briefcase bomb here and a tactical nuke there all leading to full blown world wide nuclear war.  China.  India.  Pakistan.  Israel.  Cuba.  Even New Zealand.  All played out to some old school classic like Vera Lynn’s “We’ll Meet Again.”

Well, at least Jack didn’t end up in a church only to walk toward the white light.  Though at least that would have made me feel better in that I wouldn’t have a movie to not look forward to.

Well, I sat through the finale of Lost and I have yet to see the finale of 24.

I was actually quite disappointed with Lost.  Of all the choices they had, they went with possibly the most predictable one:  Religious mumbo-jumbo.

It was a six-year-long episode of The Ghost Whisperer.  Big secret!  Well, at least we got to spend six years watching Evangeline Lilly, Emilie de Ravin and Elizabeth Mitchell (Okay, okay, and Matthew Fox and Jorge Garcia)  instead of Jennifer Love Hewitt.

It isn’t as if they really answered any questions.  Why were there two bodies in the underground cavern next to the heart of the island?  Who were all the other people?  What’s with none of the black men going to “heaven”?

I suppose it was one thing for characters believing things about the island that were religious/spiritual and another for that ending being thrown in our faces.   I’d have preferred this aspect being left a mystery.

Anna Naranja held a contest where people had to write her to tell her what they thought the island was. This was my entry:

The island is a representation of the super-id or, in other words, the collective subconscious.  While the super-ego may be expressed as a conscience in search for moral utopia, the super-id embraces positive AND negative aspects of karma.  The island is where flawed people go for the healing of self-realization; to learn there are no absolutes and there is no such thing as perfection.  Finally leaving the island means to accept ourselves, and each other, for all our qualities –
good and bad — and for what we really are… complete people.

Translate the psychobabble into mumbo-jumbo and I was pretty much right.

Lost took us all on a very interesting journey.  I applaud the show for pushing the envelope and not treating us like seven-year-olds.  We were given lots of meat to chew and digest over the years.  Maybe my expectations were just too high but this might have been a suitable ending had Lost been cancelled after the second season.  You gave us too much over the years for it to end like this.

I suppose the real question here is how does Lost rate amung the decade’s top five television shows?

  1. The Shield.  There is no doubt for me on this one.   Going from the surprised look on Terry Crowley’s face in the pilot to Vic’s agony in the finale was an epic seven seasons.   The season five finale left me staring at snow on the television screen for an hour in disbelief.
  2. The Wire.  Perhaps the most intelligent television show ever written, don’t let the gritty police drama fool you.  It’s so much more than that.  The show tackles some difficult and topical issues of crime and opportunity, education, the media, and all it means to live in a big city.  (NB: If you liked The Wire, you better be watching Treme)
  3. Dexter. Who doesn’t want to root for Dexter?
  4. The Office.  Can’t really argue with a show that so redefined a genre.
  5. The Tudors. Originally I thought this was a lame period piece produced by the CBC.  Then I watched it.  Wow.  The worst part about the show is having to choose between Natalie Dormer and Sarah Bolger.  That and loving how sympathetic they’re portraying Princess Mary and knowing full well how that turns out.

Honourable mentions…

  • Lost.  You were close.  You would have made the top 5 with a better ending and if I didn’t have a sneaking suspicion JJ Abrams got the idea while getting stoned watching Survivor.
  • True Blood.  I get the feeling you’ve started to lose your way.  Otherwise, you’d be top 5.
  • Heroes.  The first season was very special.  The rest sucked.  I almost wish you’d been cancelled so I could talk about how mad I was that such an amazing show got cancelled after one season.
  • NCIS.  Seriously.  How can you argue with a show whose ratings have gone up each season to reach number 1 in its 7th season?
  • Wonderfalls.  Cute little show met an early demise.  Imagine… Freaks and Geeks meets X-Files.
  • The Unusuals.  Quirky cop show that paid homage to Douglas Adams and The Wire.  Should have lasted more than a season.
  • Community.  Hilarious new comedy.
  • Survivor.  If you hate reality television, you can’t really dismiss Survivor’s role in giving us far too much reality television.  Colleen Haskell, you’re still number one!  (Chacun cherche son chat!)

I started this post talking about a show that redefined the continuity error and I’ll end with a show completely based on them.   24 is so full of holes you sometimes forgot that you weren’t watching Lost or Quantum Leap even.  I’m so glad 24 is over as it lasted about 6 seasons too long.  Had it been cancelled after one season, that season might have made the honourable mention list but  eight seasons and a TV movie (and more to come it seems) was far too much.  How many times do we need to be told what is happening?  We get it, Jack has to do something morally suspect to overcome the unsurmountable odds in order to save the United States.   You don’t need to tell us that 8 times an episode.

So my server was hacked leading to the last incarnation of this site to be riddled with spyware and banned by Google.  Seemed like a great opportunity to do some pruning and optimizing of my server.  That was when I discovered my host was using all sorts of old versions of software.  What’s more, they wanted to charge me to upgrade.  I didn’t take too kindly to that as it was one more thing in a long line of customer service snafus.  Even quitting was a nightmare.  I was literally in chat for 30 minutes trying to get them to cancel my account and they wouldn’t do it.  Anyway.  Seemed like a good a time as any to shop around for a new hosting service and I chose one I’d used for other projects earlier.  So here we are.

I’m still working on things but I think you can see where I’m going with it.  I found and copied most of my favourite blog posts from old blogs or social networking sites.  Forgive any missing links in posts older than this one.

I don’t know what else to say.  Um…

5, 4, 3, 2, 1… launch?

Do you know what “T” means in a launch sequence?  As in… “T-minus 10 seconds.”  It means Time.  Seriously.  The reason they do that is so they can schedule events in relation to takeoff.  This is so that if takeoff is delayed, they don’t have to recalculate and reprint all sorts of schedules.  T-minus 2 minutes means 2 minutes before takeoff.  T-plus 2 minutes means 2 minutes after.   Other similar terms are H-Hour and D-Day.  You might have heard that last one before.  Another military benefit would be that should any messages be intercepted, the enemy wouldn’t know when the event was happening.  For example, if something was happening on D-2 day, it would happen 2 days before D-Day.  No one would know when it would happen unless they knew when D-Day was going to be.   Fnord.

Via Yahoo! News

In a shift from the Vatican’s initial claim that the church was the victim of a campaign by the media and abortion rights and pro-gay marriage groups, Benedict said: “The greatest persecution of the church doesn’t come from enemies on the outside but is born from the sins within the church.”

I’m not sure Benny knows the difference between persecution and prosecution.

I’m not sure how to take this admission.  I suppose it is a good thing but it just seems to me to be a “well duh” moment.

I suppose now would be as good a time as any to chime in on the child sex abuse scandals.

There is a huge difference between an individual crime and an institutional crime.  Anyone sexually abusing a child is an individual crime.  Its the individual that is at fault whether that person is a priest or a teacher, police officer or garbage man.  The profession isn’t guilty of sexually abusing children and neither is the organization.  We can’t blame the church or the priesthood for these terrible crimes because they were performed by individuals who just happened to be priests.  Priests are human and shouldn’t be given any special treatment (for good or bad) for their chosen profession.

Statistically, there is no significantly greater rate of sex abuse from priests than any other “profession of trust.”   There is nothing inherent about the priesthood that would lead priests to molest children.  Therefore it is not an institutional crime, but an individual one.    I suppose it plausible that if there is any measurably higher rate of abuse from priests that it might be that these people as young adults felt shame in being attracted to younger children and as penance entered the priesthood.   I’m not saying that is the case, I’m merely stating there is no definitive correlation between abuse and the institution of the priesthood.  In other words, the church did not molest these kids, individuals did.  Punish the individuals for the individuals’ crimes.

That is certainly not to say the Church is innocent in this.  It appears as though the institution also behaved poorly, if not illegally, in all of this.  It appears as though there were people in positions of power within the church who actively covered up these abuses.  The cover up is an institutional crime and it is the cover up that The Church should be held responsible for.

I’m not just nit-picking here.  When someone blames The Church for molesting children, it is very easy for The Church and its excusors to claim persecution and prejudice.  You know what, they’d be right.

Lets just be reasonable and put the blame where it belongs.  That’s the only way we’ll ever get any sort of justice.

Someone has taken down and removed a cross that had been erected on federally protected land in the Mojave desert.  Via Yahoo! News

This is a really good example of the sort of false controversies that come up in issues of church/state separation.

From what I can gather, someone put up a giant cross a few years back and bolted it to a rock in the desert.  Apparently the intention was to honour American soldiers who have died in conflict.

The first problem is that this land is a federally protected preserve.  I suppose this classification holds some meaning.  For example, don’t leave your garbage lying around or build structures would seem to be logical assumptions.  But, in the late 1990′s,  they built this cross anyway and I haven’t heard of anyone suggesting they had permission to do so.  So it seems building this cross was actually illegal and was a form of vandalism.

What would seem to be a simple issue got really murky when it became political.  This cross was supposedly  a memorial to US soldiers.   As American politics wont to go, wanting this cross taken down seemed paramount to high treason — an insult to the troops!  How trying to maintain rule of law is an insult to troops, I have no idea.

The idea that this cross  is ‘for the troops’ is rather absurd.  If it really was for the troops, how about a rifle or a poppy.  But a cross?  Wouldn’t that make it for Christian troops?  No, the symbol chosen was a Christian symbol for a reason.  This cross was there for one reason only, for promoting Christianity.

The real litmus test here is what people would do if a bunch of Wiccans put up a giant pentagram to pay homage  to the troops.  You can be sure this would be removed almost immediately and I doubt you’d here any debate about it.

For the second year in a row, Wii sales have fallen.

For the fifth year in a row,  journalists have seemed to completely misunderstand the console industry.

Xbox 360 and the PS3 gambled that being HD would be enough to put make them the top two consoles but that didn’t happen. Superior graphics can be a huge advantage for any console and the difference between HD and SD games is huge. So why did the Wii outperform the superior consoles? HD penetration. PS3 and 360 were competing with each other for the HD market. In 2006 not everyone had the desire or the money to buy a new HDTV as well as a console. HD consoles came to market too early. The PS3 in particular was held back by the HD-DVD / bluray format war. Sure Sony won, but too late to help the PS3 gain dominance.

It’s taken four years for the HD market to mature to the point where sales of PS3 and 360 *combined* are just barely outnumbering sales of the Wii. The latest figures show that not even 1 in 2 homes in the US have an HD television.

I’m not too worried about Nintendo. Given their track record of releasing a new console every 5 years, in another year or two they’ll announce a new HD console that will likely be technologically superior to the 360 and PS3. Keep in mind the Wii is four years old.